Goldenarticles articles

The most leaders are often the worst leaders - leadership

 

It's a conventional occurrence, a CEO leads a band to background earnings, retires and in months, those once high-flying gain are reducing like shot ducks.

Observers blame the new leadership team. But most possible the observers are wrong. It's not just the new leaders who are screwing up. Instead, it was most liable the past CEO. Yes, the former, allegedly great CEO. Look to him for what went wrong - and what went wrong provides education for leaders at all levels.

The reasons are clear but seldom recognized. They get back to the raison d'être of leadership - which is not the accomplishment of the characteristic boss but the enhanced outcome of those being led. The harms lie in the clearness of results. For when domino effect are definite narrowly, i. e. in authoritarian terms of share, margin, shareholder value, profits, organizations lose their elasticity.

And the condition of directorial flexibility is allied to its cultivation of leadership, leadership with a broader apparition of results, encircling the essential to hire and acquire ancestors who lead others to get results.

So when decline follows the departure of great leaders, the safe bet is that those "great" leaders haven't hired and residential leaders - and so especially weren't great at all, no be important what domino effect they got. In fact, they were quite poor.

To paraphrase Vince Lombardi on winning, being paid good leaders for your team isn't everything, it's the only thing. The flash that you choose to hire, that very moment, is the living, breathing expectations of your organization.

A inquiring chemistry takes place in the hiring process. We don't just reach outward, we also reach inward. In hiring leaders, we customarily hire ourselves - our strengths and weaknesses. So the hand we reach out to shake is not just the other person's hand, it's our hand. Hire to our strengths, we hire biting leaders. Hire to our weaknesses, we hire weak leaders.

I know a brilliant, young executive in a multimillion dough manufacturing band whose desire to befall CEO of that business may break down on his infuriating penchant to hire leaders who may be good but who are none-the-less not the very best.

That's for the reason that the leaders he hires must have what is an implicit but at the same time real skill: the aptitude to curry his favor. Those leaders are presumably qualified. But they are often not the very best of the pool as they come equipped with that extraneous skill.

Since outcome on his teams are also clear as the care and feeding of his ego, that executive is hiring to his weaknesses, so he constantly makes what may eventually turn out to be garbage-in-garbage-out hiring decisions that can at last wreck his ambitions.

On the other hand, I know a new young executive, not just about as brilliant, but whose hiring aphorism may very well get him farther than along in life.

The clich? is: Hire leaders who can not only do well in this arrangement but in the next arrange and maybe even the arrangement afar that.

In other words, he hires to his strengths, his inner sense of self-confidence, which allows him to surround himself with colonize who are smarter and in some ways more clever than he - and so is creating a rising tide of accomplishment and fallout that will auxiliary his career in able ways.

As Steven Jobs said, "I don't hire colonize to tell them what to do but to tell me what to do. "

Yet hiring citizens who are adept of supplanting you isn't enough. Do more. Actively advance the knowledge, skills and careers of those leaders to give them the best feasible attempt of supplanting you.

An epitaph on a 1680 New England headstone speaks to this:

What I gave, I have.

What I spent, I had.

What I left, I lost.

By not generous it.

That can be an epitaph for botched leaders. By not charitable to your leaders, not increasing their skills and careers, you lose them, lose the break to have their raw materials augment you.

Nobody is a achievement but for others want them to be. And when you have a passionate appeal for their success, for ration them advance and complete their goals, when they know that operational on your team will be a central encounter of their career - then you will have colonize who want like hell for you to be a success.

The decline next the departure of "great" leaders indicates that those leaders were most possible control-monsters, commanders not convincers, great at in receipt of jobs done themselves but not challenging others to do them.

And when those others are ignored, they develop into inept.

So let's take an bonus index to our leaders and calculate their total value, both when they're there and after they have left. Link that value to overdue compensation, bonuses, stock options for executives and to partially-delayed evaluations for center managers and supervisors - or whatever.

When leaders characterize their act away from their tenure, they will most liable pay more interest to those two factors that are agreed crucial for any organization's continuous well-being: being paid and emergent exceptional leaders.

=============================
2004 © The Filson Leadership Group, Inc. All constitutional rights reserved.
=============================

PERMISSION TO REPUBLISH: This condition may be republished in newsletters and on web sites provided provenance is provided to the author, and it appears with the built-in copyright, supply box and live web site link. Email announcement of intent to announce is dear but not required: mail to: brent@actionleadership. com

The cause of 23 books, Brent Filson's hot books are, THE LEADERSHIP TALK: THE Best LEADERSHIP TOOL and 101 WAYS TO GIVE GREAT LEADERSHIP TALKS. He is creator and head of The Filson Leadership Group, Inc. - and has worked with thousands of leaders worldwide for the duration of the past 20 years ration them do extensive increases in hard, careful results. Sign up for his free leadership ezine and get a free guide, "49 Ways To Turn Act Into Results," at http://www. actionleadership. com


MORE RESOURCES:



















Why Likable Leaders Seem More Effective  Harvard Business Review






The Leader as Coach  Harvard Business Review







































Millennial leaders share how they manage their teams  Greater Baton Rouge Business Report




































Developed by:
home | site map
goldenarticles.net © 2019